PSN Subscription Fee Possible?
Written by Colin McFedran
Published at 2009-05-19 23:37:40
Tagged: [Rumor] [PlayStation Network]



Rumblings are that Sony may be considering a PSN subscription fee.

Not a subscription fee for access and online (ala Xbox Live) but a fee that gives you all you can eat access to PSN games be they for PSP or PS3. This isn't a new idea (Sony Asia polled its customers in early 2008 about such a thing) but scuttlebutt is that they are asking AGAIN. Hmmm.

$10 dollars per month for 5 or 6 games out of the complete library? Games must 'check in' to see if you are a current subscriber or they just don't play. Maybe bump it to $20 and you get movie streaming to boot?

What do you think? Would you be willing to pay a fee to get access to all PSN games (esp considering if PSPgo! is real all future PSP games will be ON PSN).

Update: PS3Center has posted the relevant questionnaire that I've been referencing.




[Share]



10 comments:

Offline Mike Hartnett
platinum3 gold22 silver104 bronze436     10
2009-05-19 23:51:29

That's actually kinda cool. As long as PSN access is still free, it sounds good to me.
Offline RAMPAGE_64
platinum0 gold9 silver70 bronze398     8
2009-05-20 00:24:11

I realy dont get this, why would they make you pay a fee to have all the psn games on the psn it realy dosent make sence can someone explain.
Offline Colin McFedran
platinum0 gold4 silver49 bronze367     7
2009-05-20 00:28:03

@RAMPAGE_64: You pay a fee so that you can RENT say 5 games per month from the PSN...since Sony is going digital distribution and you don't really OWN your content anymore (ie...you can't sell it like a disc) a lot of people would be interested in renting their games electronically (as opposed to gamefly etc)
Offline RAMPAGE_64
platinum0 gold9 silver70 bronze398     8
2009-05-20 00:41:30

@Colin McFedran: Hmm i dont like the sound of it becuse i cant pay for a fee every month, i would rather have it how it is now. How can this make it any better.
Offline Colin McFedran
platinum0 gold4 silver49 bronze367     7
2009-05-20 00:45:26

@RAMPAGE_64: The idea is that it is an option. You could still get your demos and pay for individual titles like you do now OR you could pay a fee and have access to 5 or so titles per month.
Offline Jason LaFave
platinum4 gold32 silver197 bronze706     12
2009-05-20 01:00:13

Looking at it as a rental service, I could see it working. My first impression, after reading your description, was that type of service where your library of "owned" titles was yours, only so long as you maintained a paid account. Those are utter shite.
Offline rtd
platinum0 gold5 silver24 bronze206     6
2009-05-20 07:09:00

since i spend over ten dollars a month probably on games and movies i dont think this sounds like a bad idea... at the same time though im happy with how things work now cos its nice and simple and it works
Offline Brian Kamm
platinum1 gold19 silver97 bronze385     9
2009-05-20 07:51:16

If Sony moves forward with this, I'd be curious to see how this impacts pricing for "owned" content, as well as the availability of demos.
Offline Tayler Bell
platinum1 gold23 silver124 bronze809     12
2009-05-20 11:23:30

I think this could be good or bad, it all depends on your perspective. I'm not opposed to paying a small fee every month that gives me total access to all games on the PSN, however a system like this may not encourage developers to make decent titles and we could end up with a whole lot of shitty games.
Offline Brian Kamm
platinum1 gold19 silver97 bronze385     9
2009-05-20 18:24:02

@Tayler Bell: and to go along with your worst case scenario, fewer demos that could warn people away from crap without paying a dime.
Log in to comment.